Dear Richard,

thank you very much for the review. Tomorrow I plan to reply in more detail (we just have relocated and reorganized our compute cluster which took a bit more time than expected). Just a quick response: we would first like to have square-lattice results with 4 dtau values per data point (as long as the dependence is significant); the additional values can also be larger than the existing ones (in order to save computer time). 8x8 should be enough for the beginning.

Best regards

Nils

On 24.08.2010, at 19:39, Richard T. Scalettar wrote:

Dear Elena and Nils, 

Thereza and I would like to finish off whatever runs would be useful
for our joint project.  Can you please let us know precisely what would
be useful to you?  Below is a summary of what we have sent in the past
(everything is at half-filling).  I apologize for the review, but I
wanted to try to remember what had already been done before discussing
new runs.

==================================================================
In 2D, I sent double occupation data for 8x8 lattices and 
U=8, 10, 12, 15 for T=0.1 to T=10.  For U=8,10,15 I sent data for
two different delta tau values.

In 3D, I sent double occupation for U= 2,4,6,8,12 and T=0.1 to T=20.  I
only sent results for one delta tau value, but several lattice sizes,
from 4^3 to 8^3.  I also sent nn spin correlations for 8x8x8 lattices
and T=0.20 to T=4.0 and U=4,6,8,12.

Meanwhile, Thereza sent 2D data for the double occupation and spin
correlations and structure factor for U=2,4,6,8 on 10x10 lattices
at dtau=0.125.  She also sent U=0.1 results on 10x10 and 14x14 lattices.

In 3D, Thereza sent double occupations at U=6, 9 for 4^3, 6^3 and 8^3
at dtau=0.125.  She also has run 4^3, 6^3 and 8^3 for 2<T<5
at different dtau, but has not sent the data yet.
==================================================================

Okay, so now please tell us what you would like.  What geometry (square,
cubic, triangular)?  What U, T?  Do you want us to extrapolate to dtau=0
and, (if possible) lattice size = infty?

It would be great to get this all done before Nils visits in October.
Perhaps we can even have a draft of a paper that we can discuss when he
is here.

Richard

cc:  Thereza

Nils Blümer
Institut für Physik, KOMET 337			Room: 03 134, Staudingerweg 7
Johannes Gutenberg-Universität		Phone: (+49) 6131 / 392 22 77
55099 Mainz, Germany				FAX:   (+49) 6131 / 392 09 54
http://komet337.physik.uni-mainz.de/Bluemer/